web analytics

Pension plans worth striking for

Posted by on Jul 1, 2011 in Retirement | 0 comments


Pension Plans Worth Striking For

Description image by Robert Brown Former professor of Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo; past president, Canadian Institute of Actuaries; expert adviser, EvidenceNetwork.ca.

The Air Canada and Canada Post strikes were about who takes on the risk in retirement pensions.

Even an actuary like me knows that starting a discussion about pension plans at a social gathering is a conversation ender. And yet, recently, two of Canada’s largest unions (Air Canada and Canada Post) went on strike to save their defined-benefit pension plans, against the wishes of the employers, who wanted to switch new employees to defined-contribution plans.

What are these plans all about, and why all the fuss?

As the name implies, a defined-benefit pension plan promises to pay you a “defined benefit” when you retire. This can take a number of forms: It can be a flat-benefit plan (e.g., if you have a pension that pays you $1,000 a year in retirement for every year of employment, and you have 30 years of service, then you get $30,000 a year), or it can pay out a percentage of your salary just prior to your retirement (e.g., if you have a pension that pays you 1.5 per cent of your final average pay for every year of employment, and you have 30 years of service, then you get 45 per cent of your final average pay). So, in a defined-benefit plan, you know what annual benefit you will receive in retirement, and, thus, you have a very good idea of how much more you need to save on your own to be fully secure.

The funding risks of a defined-benefit plan are carried by the employer (although, in the long term, higher pension costs could force wages down). Unfortunately, the present environment packs a triple whammy of bad news for these employers:

  1. Interest rates are very low. This means that, because employers have to pay out a “defined benefit” either way, the retirement fund may not earn enough in interest to cover the payments owed to retirees.
  2. Because of the financial crisis of 2008-2009, and the mediocre recovery, pension-plan assets are worth less than they were expected to be worth, and pension plans are in the hole, as companies owe more money to their employees than what they have in the plan. (Air Canada and Canada Post have deficits of $2.1 billion and $3.2 billion, respectively.)
  3. People are living longer, which means they collect pensions longer, which means company costs go up. Adding to these concerns is the fact that the ratio of retirees to active workers is now about 1:1 at both Air Canada and Canada Post. This matters because the cash flow needed to pay benefits must come from worker contributions and investment returns. With the growing ratio of retirees to workers, the plan becomes more dependent on investment returns, which are low today.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Anti-spam image